Once upon a time there was a fantastic new tv show…

It’s Sunday, so that means it’s Once Upon A Time (although we may well tape it and watch it Monday lunctime, skipping through the tiresome ads en route). We don’t get hooked on much telly these days, but this is exceptionally good. Apparently, it’s written by the people who were behind Lost, but, unlike the marooned air-crash survivors potboiler, OUAT shows no signs of disappearing up its own derriere any time soon. Let’s hope it continues to live up to its early promise.

Manchester win Uni Challenge (as predicted on this blog)

University Challenge Final 2012 teams

Congrats to Manchester University, who beat Pembroke College, Cambridge, in the 2011-12 University Challenge final. It would be churlish to cite luck as the overwhelming factor in Manchester’s success; they’ve been excellent all through this series. But I’m sure even they would agree that it certainly didn’t do any harm for the opening questions to be about literature. Manchester’s team captain, Tristan Burke just happens to be studying Eng. Lit., so he’d darn well better know some of those answers; contrast this with the hapless UCL Karran who, having given the wrong answer to a medical-related question, was swiftly called out by Jeremy Paxman reminding him ‘You’re going to be a doctor, aren’t you?’

Sometimes we’ve noticed how, if there’s one team, made up mostly of scientists and another team of mainly arts students, one side will seem to get the other’s questions. It all depends on who’s fastest to buzz in on the starters, of course, but it can make a difference if it happens often. Who, though, would have wanted that awful picture round on different categories of prime numbers. The usual strategy, if you’ve only heard of one type, is to give that as the answer to the three subsidiary questions and hope one of them’s right. Manchester have seemed at a loss with the more arcane mathematics questions, but it’s been fun to watch Burke and Co. mentally thrashing around wildly for answers. And sometimes you strike lucky, as did Burke on one almost hopeless physics round: ‘Anybody heard of any physicists? Oh, I dunno. Planck?’ Correct! That’s how you get to win great chunky trophies and get free glasses of Asti Spumanti off of Duchess Camilla of Cornwall, who presented the prize this year.

So yes, luck does sometimes play a part, but mostly it’s down to being quick on the draw and consistently strong in a wide range of subjects, ‘cos you never know what they’re going to ask next.

Mukherjee and the Pembroke team, who were the only hitherto unbeaten team in the whole series, fought valiantly and could have done the business, but were, I guess unlucky on the night. Why oh why can’t there be two winners! Well, there’s probably something against it in the rules, I suppose.

Meanwhile, I’m still trying to get my head around ‘happy primes’ though. Is it me or is maths all codswallop?

Karran KO’d by Mukherjee in Uni Challenge semi-final thriller

One should never dwell too long on tragic news, but it must be noted nevertheless that this week saw the exit of the wonderfully entertaining UCL London team featuring Jamie Karran (he of the big hair) from this year’s University Challenge.

At least it wasn’t a whitewash. But for slight weaknesses on some of the science and maths questions (at one point, a bemused Karran suggested, about some advanced physics nonsense, ‘Oh, that’s from Star Trek, isn’t it?’) it might easily have ended in a UCL victory.

As it was, though, Monday’s second semifinal was won by the cool-headed Mukherjee and Co of Pembroke College, Cambridge. The showdown next week will pit Pembroke, the only team this year to have kept a clean sheet (no appearances in last-ditch highest scoring losers’ matches) against a consistently strong Manchester team. I predict a win for Manchester, but it’ll probably be close.

Introducing Crufts Best in Show: the Keeganhound

Channel 4′s coverage of the annual Crufts dog show finished earlier this evening. Some lovely examples of various breeds were there, and I especially liked some of the exotic ones such as the saluki, the pharaoh hound, and that ferocious beast, the Dandie Dinmont.

The afghan hound is one of the most awesome sights, though. But really, you’d have to be a pro hairdresser to have any chance of grooming a creature like that and still have time left for doing anything else. It is so important these days to get one’s dog/life balance right.

Personally, if I won an afghan hound in a raffle, I’d just pop down to our local branch of Curl Up ‘n’ Dye and ask them to give him a bubble perm. My dog might end up looking like a 1970s-era Kevin Keegan, but at least I would have emancipated myself from canine coiffeur slavery, and that’s waht really matters ain’t it?

The Marne taxis

Not content with poking fun at the Prussian army, in particular Field Marshal Moltke’s enthusiasm for train spotting, I have now decided to have a pop at the valiant French forces. Not in a malicious way though. And as you will see, this is, in a roundabout way, sort of linked to the earlier stuff about the Prussians’ use of trains for rapid deployment.

On a recent edition of Mastermind, a question arose about the Battle of the Marne, which took place in late August 1914. This was an attempt to prevent the German army from taking Paris. Ultimately, this objective failed, but the events on the Marne did at least delay Paris’s fate for a short time. The French fought alongside the British Expeditionary Force and casualties were high, as they apparently also were for the Germans.

Here’s what caught my attention though. At one stage the French 6th Army came close to defeat and were only saved by the use of Paris taxis to rush 6,000 reserve troops to the front line. Whatever the exact question was (intermittent dodgy memory, see? which is why I’m not a Mastermind contestant) the required answer was ‘taxis’.

Just think though, if the action had taken place in London and the British army had needed to hire a load of London’s famous black cabs. “Sorry guv, I can’t take you sarf of the river”, may well have been a common response and could easily have tipped the scales in favour of the Hun (although Londoners’ legendary patriotism might possibly have kicked in sooner rather than later).

London cabbies would have had lots to talk about though, for years afterwards. “You’ll never guess who I had in the back o’ my cab last week. Go on, ‘ave a guess! Give up? It was the King’s Own Light Infantry.”

Come to think of it, those cabbies would have ended up becoming unbearable. Perhaps it’s just as well it all happened over in France. I’d hate to think what the final fare was though, especially if a few of the more enterprising Gallic drivers decided to milk it a little, e.g., by going round via Dijon. “How much! And you want a tip as well? Zut alors!”

Bullets, boots, bandages, and a British Rail buffet

Sometimes the simplest technology can have a huge influence on how the human race develops. Take the humble tin can, for instance. Without the tin can we probably wouldn’t have had World War II (or ‘World War Eleven’ as I am given to calling it these days). As Saul David explained on his fascinating series Bullets, Boots and Bandages, when Wellington and his eighty thousand troops were fighting Napoleon’s forces in the Peninsular War, they had to carry thousand of bricks with them for the purposes of building small brick ovens so that they could cook their food; without adequate sustenance, the guys would have been in no state to fight anyone. The men were followed (presumably at some distance) by large herds of cows, slaughtered en route to provide beef for the soldiers. No vegetarian option on the menu back then, alas!

When the tin can was invented, this huge baggage train could be drastically reduced, thus making an army in theory much more mobile. Of course, we had to wait for the invention of aircraft in the 20th century before we (or the Americans) could send armed forces to trouble spots anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice. But the tin can was a big step towards freeing the military from having to spend weeks waiting for its luggage to arrive.

One thing did puzzle me, though, in the second episode of Bullets, Boots and Bandages. The invention of the train meant that troops could be deployed much faster. And the first time the railways were used for this was in the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1), and here’s what’s bothering me: Saul David gives the background to the conflict and spells out how the Prussian Field Marshall Moltke apparently spent one hell of a lot of time poring over train timetables before embarking his men on their way to France. Are you there yet? You see, what I’m wondering is why Moltke spent any time at all checking all that data, when he could just have marched up with his Prussian army and commandeered a few trains. I doubt anyone would have argued much with him, would they?

But no, Moltke presumably wanted to do it all properly and by the book. You can just imagine all those Prussian officers milling around the cancellation boards (chalked signs rather than electronic readouts in those days, I assume) and finding they couldn’t start their war yet because of leaves on the line at Baden-Baden. Just like a Monty Python sketch, isn’t it? At least they weren’t using dear old British Rail; otherwise, they’d likely have all deserted in protest at the stale sandwiches and lukewarm tea on the buffet car.